-----Original Message----- From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: 12 April 2016 16:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?
Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote: > >> I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug. >> >> I just can't understand why one of the servers will not fire on my >> XPRIO rule. Both the headers have the same information pretty much. >> >> I've checked the spamassassin debug and they both have the same >> LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/db/spamassassin. >> >> The machine that does not fire the rule has this rule in the >> /var/db/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf >> file. >> The machine that works and fires the rule has it set in this file - >> /var/db/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf > > That's odd. XPRIO should be in 72_active.cf as it's a sandbox rule... it *is* there /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf just contains "header __XPRIO exists:X-Priority" and the same for /usr/share/spamassassin/10_hasbase.cf /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org]$ find.sh XPRIO cf /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf ------------------------------------------ I'm learning as I go here! Thanks so much for your help. It makes so much sense now - the server that was working did not have the DKIM plugin enabled, so actually it was scoring way too high! I'm surprised it did that, but now I have enabled it I probably won't see this rule hit a lot going forward. It will certainly fix some fp's. Thanks again. Rich
