Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote:

I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug.

I just can't understand why one of the servers will not fire on my
XPRIO rule. Both the headers have the same information pretty much.

I've checked the spamassassin debug and they both have the same
LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/db/spamassassin.

The machine that does not fire the rule has this rule in the
/var/db/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf
file.
The machine that works and fires the rule has it set in this file -
/var/db/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf

That's odd. XPRIO should be in 72_active.cf as it's a sandbox rule...

it *is* there

/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf just contains "header __XPRIO exists:X-Priority" and the same for /usr/share/spamassassin/10_hasbase.cf

/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org]$ find.sh XPRIO cf
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to