On Mar 8, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
how can these two stats be different?
On 08.03.16 10:19, @lbutlr wrote:
Because one is for SPAM and one is for HAM.
On Mar 8, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
Why did you remove the important part?
On 08.03.16 11:16, @lbutlr wrote:
I didn’t.
yes, you did, so I've had to paste them again below:
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
2 HTML_MESSAGE 12714 8.18 38.98 87.85 90.80
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 HTML_MESSAGE 16473 9.13 50.51 87.85 90.80
Why did the same rule hit 38.98% of all mail and 50.51% of all mail?
Because on is checking SPAM and on is checking HAM.
so why was %OFMAIL different from %OFSPAM in the first case and from %OFHAM
in the second case?
seems that the mail counts were different, but why?
Because there are differing amounts of SPAM and HAM?
if we are only checking spam mail for a given rule, how can be number of
all hits different than number of spam hits? they all should be spam,
shouldn't they?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
