> On Feb 29, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 06:24 schrieb Charles Sprickman: >> I’ve not had much luck with Bayes - when I had it enabled recently on a >> per-user basis it was just hitting the master DB server too hard with udpates > > just make a sitewide bayes > (https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup) without autolearn / > autoexpire and the default database in a folder read-only for the daemon >
I think I still have to stick with a db-backed option since I need to keep two SA servers in sync. I’ll try that today and see how the load looks. My concern with disabling autolearn is that then I’m the only one training. My spam probably looks like everyone else’s, but my ham is very different, lots list traffic and such. > a filter without bayes is worthless It seems so. :) Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman NetEng/SysAdmin Bway.net - New York's Best Internet www.bway.net sp...@bway.net - 212.982.9800 > > 0 61323 SPAM > 0 21811 HAM > 0 2547152 TOKEN > > insgesamt 73M > -rw------- 1 sa-milt sa-milt 10M 2016-02-29 00:21 bayes_seen > -rw------- 1 sa-milt sa-milt 81M 2016-02-29 00:21 bayes_toks > > BAYES_00 29161 73.70 % > BAYES_05 764 1.93 % > BAYES_20 931 2.35 % > BAYES_40 815 2.05 % > BAYES_50 2909 7.35 % > BAYES_60 424 1.07 % 8.14 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) > BAYES_80 337 0.85 % 6.47 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) > BAYES_95 306 0.77 % 5.87 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) > BAYES_99 3918 9.90 % 75.25 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) > BAYES_999 3491 8.82 % 67.05 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) > > DNSWL 53551 91.16 % > SPF 38530 65.59 % > SPF/DKIM WL 16750 28.51 % > SHORTCIRCUIT 19112 32.53 % > > BLOCKED 5206 8.86 % > SPAMMY 4985 8.48 % 95.75 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED) >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
