On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/26/2016 12:46 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 26 February 2016 at 18:14:53, Axb wrote:
On 02/26/2016 06:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
score VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG 3.999 3.999 3.999 3.999
header __VERY_LONG_REPTO Reply-To =~ /[^\s\@]{20,}\@/
Reply-To: malgorzata.warmin...@oranet.pl
very long?
20 chars?
4 points?
seriously?
that needs to be lower scored or 20 raised to much higher values
OK, set to 25 and limit 3.5
This rule is definitely bad.
A lot of euro languages have domains with a ton of chars.
imo, a lame excuse of a rule.
my LOUD -1 for this kind of exercise.
And another from me (40 chars in my address, for example).
antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it
Take another look at that regex. It's not matching domains. The match has
to be followed by an @, so it is matching the user part of the address.
FWIW, the VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG rule has not hit anything at all on my
server in the last month.
We had to tune that rule down quite a while ago. When you have an institutional
system which generates e-mail addresses based upon transliterated first-lastname
and have an international user community (including Latinos, people from
the middle-east or asian-Indians) you end up with addresses such as:
chethyaupalakxyz-ranasin...@uiowa.edu
hernan-nabucolevaxyzreirafrei...@uiowa.edu
ammarsahibabdulameer-xyzhaf...@uiowa.edu
So we see regular FPs on that rule (say 5~10 per month)
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
