On 02/26/2016 07:07 PM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:14:53 +0100
Axb wrote:
On 02/26/2016 06:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
score VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG 3.999 3.999 3.999 3.999
header __VERY_LONG_REPTO Reply-To
=~ /[^\s\@]{20,}\@/
Reply-To: malgorzata.warmin...@oranet.pl
very long?
20 chars?
4 points?
seriously?
that needs to be lower scored or 20 raised to much higher values
OK, set to 25 and limit 3.5
This rule is definitely bad.
A lot of euro languages have domains with a ton of chars.
imo, a lame excuse of a rule.
It's actually the local-part rather than the domain.
I notice that lots of companies use reply-to addresses with
very long identifiers - e.g. my credit card company and ISP both use
the form:
support-7d83jt8tjd746h49tg9hk5d8jgf87f@...
oops - missed the right side... then it's even worse...
sorry... no matter if left or right of the @, I still think it's lame...
