On 09/24/2015 06:17 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
wrote:
Am 23.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
Stating facts here, not giving an opinion. Not sure what’s up for
debate.
if it is empty it's <> aka Null-Sender and you really don't
block that because you violating RFC's, block sane autoreplies
usng it to prevent mail-loops and the subject indiactes one
thing; you donät really understand how email works
Rejecting messages based on their content PERIOD is violating the
RFC’s. What’s your point?
do what you want - a empty envelope from is not a sign of spam
I never said it was.
What I said was that when it’s coming from a server that doesn’t
except inbound messages (and hence can’t generate bounces) THEN it’s
a sign of Spam.
Since when does a server handling outbound traffic have to accept
inbound mail?
Any setup with more than a dozen boxes usually separates in/outbound traffic
