Re: Test for empty EnvelopeFrom

[Reindl Harald]

Am 23.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Philip Prindeville:

Stating facts here, not giving an opinion. Not sure what’s up for debate.

if it is empty it's <> aka Null-Sender and you really don't block that because 
you violating RFC's, block sane autoreplies usng it to prevent mail-loops and the 
subject indiactes one thing; you donät really understand how email works

Rejecting messages based on their content PERIOD is violating the RFC’s.  
What’s your point?

do what you want - a empty envelope from is not a sign of spam

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature