Am 15.09.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:and no, i am not the package maintainer but the first person who would file a bug for *any* package which rely on a internet connection due updateAm 14.09.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:in such case it's up to the distributions' maintainer to: - provide static rules in the (maybe separate) package - to warn user that he must immediately get new rules or the SA won't workOn 14.09.15 18:40, Reindl Harald wrote:it is a SA 3.4.1 bug that it don't start when /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/ while the package ships the static rules in /usr/share/spamassassin/with the original 3.4.0 setup it started just fine before sa-update as i installed all that stuff a year ago if you would have followed the thread before response you would know that alreadyI see this particular information for the first time. Maybe you could point me to proper place in the archive? Or maybe you could be more specific instead of blame everyone for everything?- and no that is not rude, you have no idea how i sound if i start to get rudethe fact you don't feel being rude does not mean you are not.Rude, arrogant, abusive, and obnoxious is all he knows, he's been kicked off many many mailing lists, and spends most his time here now Timo has finally moderated him on dovecot list, he has a huge track record of thinking he's not a bully and does nothing wrong, you only need 30 seconds of google to see otherwise.
don't remember that i asked *you* especially after you are so much more personally abusive as anybody else - the list of your personal attacks is bookmarked, so don't play saint and shut up
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
