On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:55:11 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 10. feb. 2015 15.39.41 "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> > wrote: > > > > uridnsbl URIBL_SBL_A sbl.spamhaus.org. A > >> uridnsbl foo zen.spamhaus.org. a 127.0.0.2 > > fails to lint > > > sems feasible. Have you tested adding reuse to the tflags on the > > URIBL_SBL_A rule? > > nope when i changed it it did not lint, possibe why sbl.spamhaus.org > is used ?
AFAIK reuse isn't a valid flag. Perhaps there's some confusion with reuse URIBL_SBL which means reuse the result from an existing X-Spam-Status header for QA.
