On 02/10/2015 03:38 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/9/2015 8:25 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
uridnssub URIBL_SBL zen.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.0.2
body URIBL_SBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBL')
describe URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the
SBL blocklist
tflags URIBL_SBL net
reuse URIBL_SBL
if (version >= 3.004000)
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
uridnsbl URIBL_SBL_A sbl.spamhaus.org. A
body URIBL_SBL_A eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBL_A')
describe URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in
the SBL blocklist
tflags URIBL_SBL_A net a
endif
endif
can the URIBL_SBL_A not use zen.spamhaus.org A 127.0.0.2
to save one more dns request ?
Seems feasible. Have you tested adding reuse to the tflags on the
URIBL_SBL_A rule?
URIBL_SBL_A shouldn't be "reuse"d as it includeds IPs of shared hacked
servers with very short listing periods or listings which were not
removed by ISPs.
URIBL_SBL_A has a huge FP potential