On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Wolf Drechsel <drech...@verkehrsplanung.com>
wrote:
> 2.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test:
> 40-60%
On 25.01.15 11:13, LuKreme wrote:
This is incorrect.
Bayes_50 should be scored at about 0.5, or lower.
score BAYES_50 0 0 2.0 0.8
that would indicate nwtwork rules are not used there (too bad)...
OK, but: why does Bayes saying "it looks as hammy as it looks spammy"
score so much when network tests are disabled?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real opiate of the masses isn't religion; it's the belief that
somewhere there is a benefit that can be delivered without a
corresponding cost. -- Tom of "Radio Free NJ"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 48th anniversary of the loss of Apollo 1
