Re: after months of training still most messages treated as SPAM

[Reindl Harald]

Am 25.01.2015 um 19:13 schrieb LuKreme:

On Jan 23, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Wolf Drechsel <drech...@verkehrsplanung.com> wrote:

2.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 40-60%

This is incorrect.

Bayes_50 should be scored at about 0.5, or lower

depends on the envirnoment and quality of bayes data



/etc/mail/spamassassin/local-*.cf
 score BAYES_00 -3.5
 score BAYES_05 -1.5
 score BAYES_20 -0.5
 score BAYES_40 -0.2
 score BAYES_50 2.5
 score BAYES_60 3.0
 score BAYES_80 5.0
 score BAYES_95 6.5
 score BAYES_99 7.5
 score BAYES_999 0.4

but yes, in context of the subject it's too high, on the other hand "after months of training" if it is done right there should not be too much BAYES_50 hits not should the 2.0 points *alone* matter that much

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature