listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
i was testing with a sample message, and noticed that when running
manually with --debug, there seem to be numerous differences in the
results, such as scores for the same tests differing, visual ordering
of results differing [is this significant?], and bayes not being
listed when using --debug. am i doing something wrong? are my
expectations misguided? i'm doing these tests as the user named
amavis, which the amavis software runs as.
spamassassin --test-mode --debug < message3.txt
1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[...]
spamassassin --test-mode < message3.txt
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[94.73.46.5 listed in
bb.barracudacentral.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
Apparently in the first case a score set 1 was chosen, and in the second
case a score set 3. Availability of a bayes scanner choses between the
two.
Could it be that you have a fresh bayes database which had less than 200
spam and 200 ham entries in the first attempt, but became populated
and functional by the time of the second attempt?
Mark
