On 04/12/2014 00:54, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
> "....It would be very rare, and if so you would ever more rare CC the entire > list of addresses on your spam message - sure this was a lot more common in > years gone by, but I've not seen any such evidence of it in almost 10 years, > and if you did, well, that's not my problem, its the problem of your provider > who obviously doesn't care enough to educate its users of the dangers of > spam, period......" > > lol ! ! ! is it possible to educate users against spam? > > if that were the case this list would not be needed and we would be free > ourselves from reading your posts, period ! you must be doing it wrong, the users of today are far wiser than they were 5 years ago, even my almost 80yo dad knows to handle spam, although its hard to do, get your users to *read* their welcome emails, and dont have a lawyer write the stuff, write it so an 10yo kid can understand it, its also rare spam gets passed SA anyway with our myriad of custom rules, and we block at MTA level from multiple DNSBL's amongst many other milter tricks which I'm not going into in a public forum :) So educate them well, and let SA do its job, and we wouldnt need to read your posts either.
