> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <t...@ipinc.net> wrote: > > > > On 12/2/2014 6:19 AM, LuKreme wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:28 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt<t...@ipinc.net> wrote: >>> This is assuming of course that your instantly blocking everything from a >>> sender that happens to email a honeypot. >> >> Right. That i the *point* of a honeypot. The only thing going to a honeypot >> is going to be a spammer. >> >>> Most honeypots are not used in such a draconian fashion. >> >> Every single one I’ve ever seen has. >> > > i see tons of spam relayed through throwaway accounts on Yahoo, and even some > from Gmail and Microsoft's various domains. This is to all manner of > accounts, both valid and invalid, former accounts and accounts that never > existed. So your saying it's OK to block those because you get a piece of > spam from them to a honeypot?
If a message claims to come from Yahoo and comes from xyz.tl it is already rejected. > Or are you saying that with your honeypots that the large providers get a > free pass to spam you when they email your honeypots? I don’t recall ever saying I had my own honeypots. -- Some books are undeservedly forgotten; none are undeservedly remembered
