On 19.11.14 19:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
i have here a message hitting "BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5,
DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE" but *not* MISSING_SUBJECT
most likely because "Subject: " in the headers
is that intentional?
should there not be a "SUBJECT_EMPTY" rule in that case which maybe
makes a lot of sense to penalty that case different (not that high as
if the header don't exist at all)
I remember I have asked the same some years ago.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/104646
the explanation was that the current rule detects empty subject the same as
no subject at all. IIRC it was in fact the same rule as it is now:
header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
