back to list :-) Am 19.11.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 11/19/2014 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:Hii have here a message hitting "BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE" but *not* MISSING_SUBJECT most likely because "Subject: " in the headers is that intentional? should there not be a "SUBJECT_EMPTY" rule in that case which maybe makes a lot of sense to penalty that case different (not that high as if the header don't exist at all)I don't thin it will help because a blank subject doesn't show a Ham vs. Spam differential. I show the issue in both Ham and Spam.
correct but here that's the same for MISSING_SUBJECTno joke, looked at the maillog and there is communication where i know the sending server, sender address and rcpt in person hitting that tag but sadly not which broken MUA
Statistically, I only have 12 spams out of 602 in my current stuff that was FNs folder that might meet that criteria Checking a ham folder, I have 27 emails out of ~18K that meet the same criteria.
12/602 spam versus 27/18000 ham - hmmm - more likely spam
And thinking about all the emails the fly around for mailing list moderation with no subjects, for example. Anyway, if useful, it will only be in a meta is my immediate thought
i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via "local.cf" by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which might make the difference FN/caught and should not hurt a legit message anything with else OK
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
