Am 16.09.2014 um 14:07 schrieb John Wilcock: > Le 16/09/2014 13:29, Reindl Harald a écrit : >> works, however, the penalty of 2 for 'List-Unsubscribe' without 'List-Id' >> feels a little bit unfair > > What's unfair about being penalised for not being standards-compliant? > > RFC2919 states that a mailing list SHOULD add a List-Id header, > just as RFC2369 states that it SHOULD add a List-Unsubscribe header
i am talking about a *newsletter* not a classical mailing-list and the word SHOULD in a RFC has a different meaning than MUST hence a prenalty of 2 is large the point is that 'List-Unsubscribe' in context of a newsletter with modern MUA's is helpful even if it is not a mailing-list because it can be displayed in a standard way *additional* to the mandatory unscubscribe-link you need to seek in the message so somebody try to do the enduser something good (as i did) and add this header without invent a "list-id" get a *high* penalty that's how things are if you have both jobs - mailadmin and developer of CMS systems with newsletters and try to make both jobs as good as possible - you see both sides
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
