Am 25.08.2014 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel Staal: > --As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have > said: > >>> masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't >>> care beyond that >> >> yes, but given that the intention is to flag message above >> 5 with [SPAM] and reject messages above 7 which is the >> intention running SA as milter the reduced score matters > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > Who sets that policy? Is it something you could think about > changing (if it's a problem).
finally i do that - which values needs to be found out and honestly seeing that change i am unsure how to set score limits for both (flag and reject) to prevent too mach messages passing through and at the same time if such a large change happens introduce false positives from one day to another i admit not have that much expierience but want to avoid major mistakes in the setup as good as possible before going live > Did the percentage of spam flagged vs. rejected change overall? i am at early testing of SA and there is no active mail flow since i am about finsish admin backends and how to generate config files for SA/ClamAV/Postfix which is now at a nearly "well, for my private doamin as public test good enough" > Every time the rules update some rules will be scored higher and > some lower, so figuring out each individual case is going to be > pointless, but if the overall percentages remain stable your system > hasn't actually changed how it operates as said - i am about implement SA, saw the message from the update cronjob the first time for some days and looked a bit deeper if things changed
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
