On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 13:13 -0700, redtailjason wrote: > Are you open to the possibility of upgrading to 3.4.0 and using the Redis > backend for Bayes? (Just offering an alternative.) > > We have been developing and upgrade plan to 3.4. Based on this, we are > prioritize this upgrade and will be expediting it. Thanks.
Thanks for including the part you're directly referring to, as I requested. However, please do distinguish the quoted part from your comments. The first paragraph actually was written by John, but your post lacks any hint of the author, and even worse displays the quote and your text visually identical. See the difference between your latest two posts and any other post in this thread? I blame Nabble for even making this possible. In a reply, the quoted text must be visually distinctive. More reason to avoid Nabble. > View this message in context: > http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Delays-with-Check-Bayes-tp111067p111118.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sic. This is a mailing list. And Nabble a third-party list archive service and poor forum-style web frontend to the mailing list. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
