On 21/08/14 09:00, John Hardin wrote: > > Are you open to the possibility of upgrading to 3.4.0 and using the > Redis backend for Bayes? (Just offering an alternative.) >
We just last week moved over to 3.4.0 with a central Redis backend with 6 spamd servers spread over USA and Europe. Bit of a stretch in terms of WAN latency but it seems to be working really well. I love doing a "spamc -L spam" against one SA server and then immediately re-scanning the same message by a different one and seeing the BAYES_99 light up :-) So far, sooooo good! Thanks for sharing this. We will take a look at that to see if it works for us. Regards, Jason -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Delays-with-Check-Bayes-tp111067p111119.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
