On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Greg Ledford wrote:
Can someone tell me why Spamassassin/Amavis are missing these types of
very obvious emails? I'm still trying to figure all of this out and I
know I missed something somewhere. Thanks.
Those headers don't seem to claim that message was even scanned by SA.
Do messages that SA *does* properly identify have headers indicating
things like SA version, which rules hit, and the score?
What should the headers look like if SA scanned them? I just assumed it was
working.
They may take a couple of different forms depending on how SA is hooked
into your mail infrastructure.
Basic SA headers start with "X-Spam", like X-Spam-Status and
X-Spam-Report.
If you're using Amavis, then there would be some Amavis headers. (Note
that the mention of Amavis in the Received header that the sender added -
"Received: by 02942887.pygmyweed.somedaystoday.in" - is irrelevant.)
How is SpamAssassin hooked into your email infrastructure?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason it took so long to get Bin Laden is that it took the
SEALs five years to swim that far into the desert. -- anon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until the 69th anniversary of the end of World War II
