>> Can someone tell me why Spamassassin/Amavis are missing these types of >> very obvious emails? I'm still trying to figure all of this out and I >> know I missed something somewhere. Thanks.
>Those headers don't seem to claim that message was even scanned by SA. >Do messages that SA *does* properly identify have headers indicating things >like SA version, which rules hit, and the score? What should the headers look like if SA scanned them? I just assumed it was working.
