On 06/02/2014 05:51 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
SA 3.3.1 (CentOS-6)
MISSING_FROM rule trigger.
I am curious about the behaviour of this rule. For example I can see this in
a recently received message:
. . .
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.8 tagged_above=-999 required=2.5
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BDY_DRUG=0.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MISSING_FROM=1.5,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
. . . -- much DKIM related stuff here including signature --
Received: from 216.185.71.69
(SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejc)
by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP;
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:07 -0400
Message-ID: <6f60bcdbaaa72e02b4633a40eb76a68e.squir...@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:07 -0400
Subject: PKTA01453294 Guardian Drug PU#655787
From: "James Byrne (Exports)" <byrn...@harte-lyne.ca>
To: . . .
As far as I can tell this message has a From: header. Does MISSING_FROM test
for something else? I cannot tell what it does since all of the explanations
seem to have been removed from https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests.html.
tried grepping in rules directory? ;-)
header __HAS_FROM exists:From
meta MISSING_FROM !__HAS_FROM
describe MISSING_FROM Missing From: header
rule is so simple it can hardly go wrong...
does it only hit your webmail msgs?
