On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:58 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
abuse@<easily identifiable, stable and unique domain> should be available. >> Wiki and docs are fine, but should not be needed if possible. >> > > Oh my god, yes! Sites who force you to go through a web page rather than > having a working abuse@ address are saying "we really don't want you to > report abuse to us." Yes, and no. The quality of abuse@ mails varies widely. Feedback through a structured form on a website can drastically improve the quality and make such feedback actionable. But yes, abuse@ should still be available. -- Matthias
