On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 20:18 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Nice, thank you. I am more inclined to use a per-user database, and
> call "spamc -u myuser -L spam". Let's see how that goes.
The real difference between sa-learn and spamc -L is how to feed it.
The spamc way expects a single message on STDIN, which usually is most
applicable for integration with your MUA. It also easily enables mail
storage and SA to be on different machines.
sa-learn expects the message(s) as file name. Requires direct access of
the mail storage, but enables training of entire mail folders with a
single command.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
