On Friday, November 08 2013, John Hardin wrote: >> I don't think sa-learn can help with spamd. Its own manpage mention >> that, for spamd users, "spamc -L" is the way to go. > > Not true. sa-learn is just fine for spamd with a global Bayes > database, and it's recommended for administrative simplicity if you > have that environment.
Aha, interesting, thanks for explaining. > Global vs. per-user Bayes databases is a site-specific > config. However, it should be consistent - spamd should be reading > from and training to the bayes database of the user running spamc, so > I don't off the top of my head know why it dosn't appear to be working > for you. > > What are the Bayes database statistics before and after running spamc -L? > (sa-learn --dump magic) > > I use a global database and sa-learn, so I don't have any direct > experience with spamc -L quirks, sorry. That's why I suggested > sa-learn. Nice, thank you. I am more inclined to use a per-user database, and call "spamc -u myuser -L spam". Let's see how that goes. -- Sergio
