On 10/13/2013 2:17 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
> And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if
the ham > corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I don't know how quickly this
change
will go out, sorry.
Actually, I don't think Darxus' monitoring script is in sync with the
system because we've put out rules for the past 2 months plus every
single night.
What's the ham threshold at? Has it been reduced from 150k?
Last night's net masscheck had 110691 ham, which shouldn't be enough
to publish, correct?
Today's is at 126214 so far, and unless more comes in that's not
enough to publish either, correct?
Odd, the current corpus quality check reports 127492 total ham.
Regardless, I will check tomorrow and see if the changes are in the
latest rules update.
I think the thresholds are the same but for example, here's a snippet of
the cron for last night:
HAM: 203085 (150000 required)
SPAM: 369343 (150000 required)
I know like a year ago I tweaked some threshold settings for date ranges
so maybe there is a discrepancy between the ruleqa and this?
When in doubt, though, the cron output and the atd command output that
updates the zone to notify for a new rules release has fired every night
correctly since at least August 9th. I can't easily check before that
in my logs.
