These two rules are adding 4.0 pts to most email I receive from
debian-user that originates from Gmane, putting quite a bit of legit
Debian list mail into my spam folder. With these two rules adding 4
pts, a tiny hit from any other rule puts it over the top.
FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 needs to have a -much- lower score, or be eliminated
entirely, as it overlaps with at least 3 other tests, as pointed out
previously by another user. If a message makes it through Gmane, and
Debian, and then gets flagged by my "stock" rules introduced through an
auto update, then something is obviously wrong.
Example:
Content analysis details: (4.8 points, 4.2 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
2.8 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2
1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5314]
Received: from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100])
by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95BD6C0CE
for <s...@hardwarefreak.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:23:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 6EDAF1AD; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <gldu-debian-use...@m.gmane.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on bendel.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,FREEMAIL_FROM,
LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Original-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E553017F
for <lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:23:16
+0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.735 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id pt3Xy4CFnT1w for <lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org>;
Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4754D14C
for <debian-u...@lists.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:23:09 +0000
(UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gldu-debian-use...@m.gmane.org>)
id 1VV122-0007gh-Sa
for debian-u...@lists.debian.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:23:06 +0200
Received: from 189.151.225.189 ([189.151.225.189])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <debian-u...@lists.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:23:06 +0200
Received: from hvw59601 by 189.151.225.189 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <debian-u...@lists.debian.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:23:06 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59...@care2.com>
Subject: Re: linux-image-3.10-3-amd64 unbootable: /dev/disk/by-uuid not
created
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:22:56 -0500
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <l3bpg7$gra$1...@ger.gmane.org>
References: <52591922.7040...@opendreams.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: use...@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 189.151.225.189
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
In-Reply-To: <52591922.7040...@opendreams.net>
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <kbycL9iK3BP.A.PQB.ulWWSB@bendel>
Resent-From: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-u...@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/658107
X-Loop: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-u...@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
Jesse Molina wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a Debian unstable host which successfully boots from the
> linux-image-3.10-1-amd64 kernel package. However, I recently installed
> the linux-image-3.10-3-amd64 kernel package, and it is unbootable.
>
> When I boot from the linux-image-3.10-3-amd64 package kernel, the boot
> fails and drops me into the initramfs busybox. The messge "Gave up
> waiting for the root device." appears, along with "ALERT!
> /dev/disk/by-uuid/bla-bla-bla-my-id-here does not exist.".
>
> The problem appears to be that udev is not creating /dev/disk/by-uuid/*
> and similar objects. The only directory being created in /dev/disk is
> "by-id". Note that the mdadm arrays are being successfully assembled
> and I can see them if I cat /proc/mdstat.
>
> the root= argument in grub is a UUID of a mdadm RAID1 array. This
> host's boot part is a RAID1, and the root part is a RAID5. This is
> standard PC desktop hardware with four disk drives upon which the md
> RAIDs are built.
>
> The host has been dist-upgraded as of this time.
>
> Advice appreciated. Otherwise, I'll file a bug on it.
try 'rootdelay=5' (w/o quotes) as bootparam.
Hugo
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a
subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/l3bpg7$gra$1...@ger.gmane.org
