That's the thing. Why do they happen? I don't want them to happen? What's their relevance in a URIBL check?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/17/2013 08:35 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote: >> >> HI Axb, >> >> But, we don't require A and NS lookups for a domain to query for it's >> existence in URIBL, right? I don't see the point of doing the NS >> lookups in URIBL module. > > > > these lookups check a URI domain's NS and A record. If not there, where > would you expect it to happen (for a URL in msg's body) ? > > >> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/17/2013 06:59 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Short Version: See subject. >>>> Long Version: Read below. >>>> >>>> So far, I've got a nice feedback from the community, thanks for that. >>>> I want to know why are DNS queries like URI-A and URI-NS done? For a >>>> specific case that I'm trying to use, I want spamassassin to use just >>>> DNSBL and nothing else. >>>> >>>> I don't see URI-A and URI-NS defined in either default rules >>>> (/use/share/spamassassin/) or in sa-update related rules. >>>> (/var/lib/spamassassin). >>>> >>>> Setting score for URI-A and URI-NS also doesn't do anything. I could >>>> only see it in action in URIDNSBL.pm under sub-routine >>>> completed_lookup_callback. Is there a reason why URI-A and URI-NS are >>>> done unconditionally and don't have a option to disable them? >>>> >>>> Is there a way I can disable them? >>> >>> >>> >>> disable URIBL lookups by disabling plugin in .pre file (as I suggested >>> before that you revise the .pre files) >> >> >> >> > -- Regards, Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
