On 10/31/2012 06:11 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/31/2012 12:07 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 3:56:32 PM, you wrote:
KAM> However, it seems that your configuration is using rules outside the
KAM> project (which I author) and that has no bearing on SA.
The rule under discussion is HK_LOTTO which is defined in
72_active.cf which I'm sure is part of the project.
Why are you claiming that it has no bearing on SA?
My apologies. I'm mixing up people. One person responded mixing
KAM_LOTTO and HK_LOTTO.
KAM> Additionally, it appears your configuration is scoring the rules
higher
KAM> than it should at this time.
Looks like HK_LOTTO is scoring exactly what 50_scores.cf says it
should be.
Then we need to get your ham involved in the corpus for masscheck!
regards,
KAM
wondering....
score HK_LOTTO 3.599 2.755 2.993 3.599
should this score be in hardwired in 50_scores.cf ?
Shouldn't it be set via GA in 72_scores.cf ?
