Hello Kevin, Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 3:56:32 PM, you wrote:
KAM> However, it seems that your configuration is using rules outside the
KAM> project (which I author) and that has no bearing on SA.
The rule under discussion is HK_LOTTO which is defined in
72_active.cf which I'm sure is part of the project.
Why are you claiming that it has no bearing on SA?
But just to avoid confusion which of these are not part of SA?
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low
* trust
* [85.115.56.190 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 HK_LOTTO_SUBJECT HK_LOTTO_SUBJECT
* -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
* 1.2 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
* [score: 0.5000]
* 1.7 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64
encoding
* -2.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
* 3.6 HK_LOTTO HK_LOTTO
KAM> Additionally, it appears your configuration is scoring the rules higher
KAM> than it should at this time.
Pardon!
[root@mail spamassassin]# cd 3.003002
[root@mail 3.003002]# cd updates_spamassassin_org
[root@mail updates_spamassassin_org]# grep HK_LOTTO *
50_scores.cf:score HK_LOTTO 3.599 2.755 2.993 3.599
Looks like HK_LOTTO is scoring exactly what 50_scores.cf says it
should be.
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpsWEpadnq2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
