Den 2012-07-13 16:33, John Hardin skrev:
So does that mean it may be legitimate to treat an SPF PASS as "something bad" if the SPF rule is defined in an "abusive" manner?
meta __META_DNSWL_ANY (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI || RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED || RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW)
meta META_SPF_DNSWL (__META_DNSWL_ANY && SPF_PASS) describe META_SPF_DNSWL Meta: spf pass and listed in dnswl safe score META_SPF_DNSWL -0.5 # optional disable autolearn bayes on this rule feel free to test SPF_HELO_PASS aswell i left out RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE this is intended here
