On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:

> So does that mean it may be legitimate to treat an SPF PASS as
> "something bad" if the SPF rule is defined in an "abusive" manner?

Absolutely.  If you do not want to receive mail from a certain
domain and it passes SPF, then there's pretty good evidence the
mail really *is* from that domain and that you can apply your
domain policy.

Regards,

David.

Reply via email to