On 9/8/2011 2:26 PM, Steve wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 19:13, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> Keep in mind that the "To:" header in an email is for decorative
>> purposes only and has no relevance at all to where the email is
>> delivered. In a normal email, the "To:" header will generally match
>> with the destination, but with spam, anything goes. For example, take
>> a look at the headers of this message: To:
>> users@spamassassin.apache.org but it was delivered to you. 
> All valid - from the perspective of explaining the behaviour of an
> existing system. I realise that the To: line is independent of the
> envelope... but, for example, in the context of this message "To:"
> users@spamassassin.apache.org, I get a "Received:" header that mentions
> that it is "for" the address I used to sign up to this mailing list. 
> Hence why I had expected the envelope address to be reflected somewhere
> in the headers of the delivered message.

Depends on the MTA.  With mine (Courier-MTA), alias conversions happen
first, so the only address referenced in the headers is the final
destination.

> In any case, as it turns out, none of this helps me store a single
> inbound spam once - rather than duplicate it for each address in the
> envelope... which, to my thinking, remains a sane objective...

Agreed.  Although you would think that a sane MTA would see that all
aliases resolve to a single destination and just deliver the message once.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to