* Walter Hurry <walterhu...@lavabit.com>:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:44:14 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> 
> > * Walter Hurry <walterhu...@lavabit.com>:
> >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:56:03 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Using an asynchronous approach using different databases is
> >> > interesting, but as I understand the solution discussed addresses
> >> > read performace. I am interested in write performance. How far could
> >> > you take it before PSQL topped out? Any special hardware in use?
> >> 
> >> If it were me, I wouldn't be using psql, but libpq.
> > 
> > I take it its faster. (I'm not a programmer). Why would you use it?
> 
> It's a C interface to PostgreSQL. If performance is the criterion, it is 
> not a good idea to launch an executable (psql) just to insert a single 
> row.

Obviously! Thanks for the clarification.

-- 
state of mind ()

http://www.state-of-mind.de

Franziskanerstraße 15      Telefon +49 89 3090 4664
81669 München              Telefax +49 89 3090 4666

Amtsgericht München        Partnerschaftsregister PR 563

Reply via email to