On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:35:01 +0300
Henrik K <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> Feel free to donate your code for SA and stop the pointless bashing.
Um? I'm not "bashing" SA. I think it's a fine piece of work. All I asked
is if anyone has made a CDB back-end for SA and I explained why I thought
it might be a good idea. Don't take it so personally.
As for donating our code, I can't do that because we wrote our own Bayes
implementation and our storage back-end won't fit into SA's design.
> I like Bayes working realtime.
I can live with a 10-minute delay. I don't believe real-time training
improves detection. But anyway, adding a CDB back-end doesn't mean
you'd have to remove other back-ends. People could choose according
to their tastes.
> Claiming SA "ignores large sites" because it doesn't have a complex
> CDB backend is ridiculous.
I'm not at all claiming SA ignores large sites. I'm claiming that people
with *your* attitude ("Other 99.9% of user don't really care...") are
ignoring large sites.
-- David.
