Marcin Mirosław wrote: > W dniu 30.03.2011 16:21, Per Jessen pisze: >> Well, isn't the behaviour you're seeing working-as-expected then? If >> it was an indefinite loop, setting up a time-out would be a possible >> work-around. If the bayes code is doing what it is supposed to do, >> but just taking long to do it, no work-around is needed. >> Instead, you could try limiting the size of what is being processed >> by spamd. > > It's not so easy to limit message size. It would be ideally to have > config option "bayes_max_msg_size". I'm getting huge mail (UCE) which > should be scanned by SA. Bayes isn't needed in this case (remained > rules are enough to score such mails), but i can't turn off bayes > engine for some mails.
Hmm, what size of mails are we talking about? I only scan mails <2Mb, which I think is quite liberal. I guess a bayes_max_msg_size option is not a bad idea though. /Per Jessen, Zürich
