Marcin Mirosław wrote: > W dniu 30.03.2011 15:47, Per Jessen pisze: >> Yes, I meant the child - obviously, it sounds as if it's a problem in >> the bayes processing. I don't use SA bayes, but that problem ought >> to be investigated first before we look at work-arounds. IMHO. > > I'm expecting that bayes can do its work for long time, i'm working on > mail with many, many words.
Well, isn't the behaviour you're seeing working-as-expected then? If it was an indefinite loop, setting up a time-out would be a possible work-around. If the bayes code is doing what it is supposed to do, but just taking long to do it, no work-around is needed. Instead, you could try limiting the size of what is being processed by spamd. /Per Jessen, Zürich
