On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/06/2011 11:33 AM, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:51 -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
I just found an incoming message which is ham but marked as spam.
It received a score of 14 because it is in the auto white-list.
Shouldn't it receive a negative score?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
Despite its name, the AWL is a score averager, based on the sender's
history (limited by net-block).
I encountered that misconception so much that I altered its description
it in my local.cf:
describe AWL Adjust score towards average for this sender
As a reminder, SVN trunk uses:
describe AWL From: address is in the auto white-list
Even if we don't change what "AWL" means, we don't need to spell it out
as often. Cleaning up the docs would certainly be useful, but simply
changing the description would cover most of the ground for us.
Open a boog for it.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute
an emergency on my part. -- David W. Barts in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until Daylight Saving Time begins in U.S. - Spring Forward
