On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 11:03 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Chris wrote:
> 
> > cdneumann
> > <cdneum...@hot.rr.com>,  "cantrell, james" <jl...@embarqmail.com>,
> > "@pop.embarq.synacor.com>, \"ballard\", \"aajhp" <bunnysi...@aol.com>
> >
> > The two look the same except for the last few entries where the one
> > marked spam has the last few addressees borked. Apparently something is
> > intermittently adding the @pop.embarq.synacor.com to the list.
> 
> Don't focus too closely on the @pop.embarq.synacor.com. Look for simpler 
> solutions.
> 
> I'd suggest from the above that the sender's address book entry for 
> <bunnysi...@aol.com> is what's screwed up. It might have 
> "@pop.embarq.synacor.com>, \"ballard\", \"aajhp" as the name associated 
> with that address.
> 
> Having multiple examples to compare will be a good idea, though, and might 
> rule out the address book idea, unless several address book entries are 
> borked in a similar fashion.
> 

Thanks John, I'll keep a watch on any more that land in my spam folder
and compare the entries.

-- 
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11°N 97.89°W (Elev. 1092 ft)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to