On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 06:35 +0100, Stefan Henß wrote:
[...]
> - For each question (first entry in a conversation) find the best reply
> from its answers.
> - Select the most relevant and well formatted question/answer-pairs for
> each FAQ.
Heh, nice -- glimpsing over the answers, I immediately spotted quite a
few I believe I once authored. :)
I guess this supports my statements in the "postfix / procmail" thread,
coincidentally just 2 days ago. Carefully crafted responses, discussing
and explaining the problem, rather than merely giving a quick-fix
solution, do matter.
> For the evaluation part I'd like to ask you for having a look at one or
> two FAQs and maybe give some comments on how far the questions matched
> the FAQ's title, how relevant they were etc.
I strongly agree with what has been raised earlier. The answers (maybe
the questions as well) should be attributed to their original author.
And every Q/A needs a link to an archive, where the entire thread can be
found.
The latter is particularly important due to the Q/A style with a single
answer. However, often the discussion would be important, too, and only
during that exchange the real issue (question) surfaces.
For a similar reason, some answers appear to be slightly out of context.
Sometimes as a whole. And sometimes single paragraphs break the flow of
logic, reasoning or even topic. The latter is due to the original post
using in-line replies, referring to the quote directly above. The A as
displayed, however, simply strips any quotes.
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
