On 2/23/2011 8:54 AM, Alex wrote: >> I'm currently doing research for my bachelor thesis on how to automatically >> extract FAQs from unstructured data. > ... >> For the evaluation part I'd like to ask you for having a look at one or two >> FAQs and maybe give some comments on how far the questions matched the FAQ's >> title, how relevant they were etc. >> Here's the direct link to the SpamAssassin FAQs: >> http://faqcluster.com/spam-spamassassin-mail-rule-rules > That's pretty cool. I looked through a few, and it indeed looks helpful. > > Not so much on how relevant they are, but two things that I thought of > after viewing a few articles: > > - How about a pointer to the original version, in case the reader > wants to follow the whole thread? > - How about a time/date stamp so users have an idea where it fits in context?
I'll second the suggestion for a time/date stamp. In my opinion every article on the net should have a time/date stamp attached. This way you can tell whether the information is relevant to what you are doing or if it is old and possibly out-of-date. -- Bowie
