Not a chance. Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
On 2/7/11 1:28 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:36 -0500 >> Michael Scheidell<michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote: >> >>> because HELO doesn't match RDNS. > On 01.02.11 09:54, David F. Skoll wrote: >> Rejecting on that basis would also cause tons of false-positives. > It's also violation of all SMTP RFCs (former and current), because they > explicitly say that the sender MUST NOT reject smtp session just because > HELO string does not match resolved FQDN. > Does anyone else reject messages where the rDNS maps to more than one PTR record?
