Hello Giles Coochey, Am 2011-02-01 15:46:05, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Personally, rejecting a message on the basis of a single criteria is > pretty harsh. You don't need to be the RFC-police to catch nearly > all spam and I'm sure that rejecting on a single issue or dubious > fact will affect the receipt of genuine non-SPAM messages.
Sorry, but if I would not reject on wrong rDNS, I have to bother
spamassassin with arround 700.000 additional spams per day. I am
currently using a MTA-proxy and 4 INBOUND MTAs (Dual-Xeon 3 GHz) to get
rid of the spams.
And the inbound-proxy reject already additional based on ZEN responses.
(own caching DNS required otherwise "spamhaus" would backlist you)
This give arround 6-8 million rejects per day.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
