On 11/01/2011 4:47 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org
<mailto:je...@surbl.org>> wrote:
On Sunday, January 9, 2011, 12:50:12 PM, Lawrence Rogers wrote:
> On 09/01/2011 4:41 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> On 9.1.2011 18:40, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>> Just wondering if anyone else is noticing this. Spam bot spam
is down to
>>> 1/4 of what it was a year ago. I had noticed my black list
shrinking.
>>> But here's some raw data from someone who tracks it.
>>>
>>> Now:
>>>
>>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
<http://www.sdsc.edu/%7Ejeff/spam/cbc.html>
>>>
>>> A year ago:
>>>
>>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/2010/bc-20100109.html
<http://www.sdsc.edu/%7Ejeff/spam/2010/bc-20100109.html>
>>>
>>> Are we winning?
>>>
>> It has been in news also, spam has decreaced since autumn and
then again
>> in december. We just have to wait and see if this is permanent.
>>
> It has been since the shutdown of Spamit late last year
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/8090100/Spam-falls-by-a-fifth-after-Russian-operation-shut-down.html
Rustock is spamming again:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
http://cbl.abuseat.org/totalflow.html
I concur. I see a rise again this week. It really dropped from
around Christmas time.
- Julian
I get criminals take Christmas off too lol
- Lawrence
