On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org> wrote: > On Sunday, January 9, 2011, 12:50:12 PM, Lawrence Rogers wrote: > > On 09/01/2011 4:41 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> On 9.1.2011 18:40, Marc Perkel wrote: > >>> Just wondering if anyone else is noticing this. Spam bot spam is down > to > >>> 1/4 of what it was a year ago. I had noticed my black list shrinking. > >>> But here's some raw data from someone who tracks it. > >>> > >>> Now: > >>> > >>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html<http://www.sdsc.edu/%7Ejeff/spam/cbc.html> > >>> > >>> A year ago: > >>> > >>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/2010/bc-20100109.html<http://www.sdsc.edu/%7Ejeff/spam/2010/bc-20100109.html> > >>> > >>> Are we winning? > >>> > >> It has been in news also, spam has decreaced since autumn and then again > >> in december. We just have to wait and see if this is permanent. > >> > > It has been since the shutdown of Spamit late last year > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/8090100/Spam-falls-by-a-fifth-after-Russian-operation-shut-down.html > > Rustock is spamming again: > > http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek > > http://cbl.abuseat.org/totalflow.html > > > I concur. I see a rise again this week. It really dropped from around Christmas time.
- Julian
