On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:27 -0700, John Rudd <jr...@ucsc.edu> wrote:
>Having full rDNS isn't the issue. > >What probably happened was something like this: > >1) your ISP reported their dynamic addresses to SORBS, or SORBS >inferred them via various means. > >2) SORBS listed those addresses in DUL > >3) Your ISP ran low on static addresses, and allocated to you one of >the addresses that was formerly a dynamic address. > >4) Your ISP did NOT inform SORBS of the change, or SORBS mechanisms >for inferrence didn't pick up the change (or they don't bother to try >to detect such changes) > >5) You're in the DUL even though you think you shouldn't be, because >you're on a static IP. > >What you need to do is force #4 to get fixed. > >rDNS is a helpful part of the bigger picture, but has nothing to do >with the above 5 steps/events. > > > >On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:17, Nigel Frankcom <n.frank...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My IP has full rDNS supplied by my ISP - please feel free to ping -a >> 217.36.54.209 and tell me what exactly is wrong wit that? >> >> On 20 April 2010 16:08, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote: >>> On tir 20 apr 2010 15:04:53 CEST, Nigel Frankcom wrote >>> >>>> If anyone has any ideas - please let me know? >>> >>> if your isp give you dul ip, then you must use isp smtp servers as relay >>> >>> not a fault of sorbs some isp is badly informing users on howto >>> >>> if you really want to use you ip as server make sure it relly is allowed >>> from your isp, the report from sorbs says me its not a static ip >>> >>> ps: if you need to have mail sent from home server make it use smtp auth to >>> gmail, and the problem is totaly gone, if that is not possible change isp ! >>> >>> -- >>> xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >>> Fair point, just come off the phone to my ISP, they can't get any response from sorbs. Nigel PS - the ISP approach was my 1st attempt - a week ago tomorrow (GMT)
