On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 22:59 +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Am 26.02.10 22:53, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
> > code? Then this would seem to be a general sketch: Write the plugin,
> > while keeping DNSWL tightly in the loop to sync the process. Submit the
>
> Actually, Darxus is editor at dnswl.org and contributes a nameserver -
> he is very much in the loop with the project. "--report" would be a good
> addition to abuse reporting through the webinterface, that's why Darxus
> is investigating.
So my second attempt at interpreting a single-sentence question was
successful. Yay. :) Why didn't he just say that in the first place?
I guess the stated requirement still stands. Though shouldn't be much of
an obstacle in this case.
Anyway, my initial comments probably also still stand. For the reporting
to actually be accepted en-masse, the user likely needs to register with
you, no? And of course, the part about forwarding [1] and network setup
is important, too. [2]
guenther
[1] Open Source projects love to give out forwarding addresses at their
domain. Gathers spam, even if one doesn't use them.
And then there are moderation and role accounts. Same.
[2] I've fallen into this myself, though not with reporting. Changed
SMTP servers for the forwarding service resulted in the wrong IPs
being checked, and less accurate DNS BL results.
This also affects exactly this point of handing-over SMTP.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
